Why wouldn’t they remain the name?
April 26, 2008Yesterday I was driving to campus, was at the roundabout entrance there and saw one man standing there giving out brochure to car owners that passby the entrance roundabout and I was totally speechless because imagine if one car stopped and spend 5 seconds to accept the brochure, then it would be a jam out of nowhere and for no reason, but I was also the one that spent the 5 seconds to collect the brochure and out of the blue, it was Regal Park Sdn Bhd brochure that want to promote their apartment renting. As far as I’m concern I already heard of Emerald Park Sdn Bhd but look at that, is it Emerald Park that we all know for couple of years? How come they had change their company name to Regal Park Sdn Bhd, that’s very surprising. We all always called it “EP” short-form for Emerald Park and now we will have to call it “RP” for Regal Park.
2 Responses to “Why wouldn’t they remain the name?”
I get the that too and I went to ask. Kinda kena cheat. Electricity and water not included.. ><”
By Kels on Apr 26, 2008 at 6:04 am.
Actually EP is under RP. RP manages the block A, while EP manages block B and block C. They are the same company. Juz that RP is a parent company, EP is its subsidiary
By ryan on Apr 29, 2008 at 12:01 am.